\framebox{
\vbox{\vspace{2mm}
\hbox to 6.28in { {\bf STAT 205~Probability Theo...
...it Scribe:} Daniel Metzger, {\it Editor:} Chris Haulk \hfill }
\vspace{2mm}}
}


Prerequisites

Random Variables, Expected Value

Summary

A function space is merely a set of functions, or a set of equivalence classes of functions. This document will introduce the important $ L^p$ function spaces and state their most basic properties.

Function Spaces

Banach spaces: Let $ X$ be a normed linear space with norm $ \vert\vert\cdot\vert\vert$. If $ X$ is complete 1 with respect to the induced metric $ d(x,y) := \vert\vert x-y\vert\vert$, then the pair $ (X, \vert\vert\cdot \vert\vert)$ is called a Banach space.

Hilbert spaces: Let $ K$ be a linear space with an inner product $ \langle \cdot,\cdot \rangle$. If $ K$ is complete with respect to the induced metric $ d(x,y) := \sqrt{\langle x-y,x-y\rangle}$, then $ (K, \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle)$, is called a Hilbert space.

There are plenty of Banach spaces and Hilbert spaces that are not function spaces. For example, $ {\mathbb{R}}^n$ equipped with the usual inner product is a Hilbert space, and hence a Banach space. Points of $ {\mathbb{R}}^n$ (considered simply as points) are not functions, so $ {\mathbb{R}}^n$ is not a function space. However, there is a large class of function spaces that are either Hilbert spaces or Banach spaces.

$ L^p(\mu,S)$ spaces: Let $ (S, \mathcal{S}, \mu)$ be a measure space. Set

$\displaystyle \mathcal{L}^p(\mu,S) := \{f:S\to {\mathbb{R}}$: $\displaystyle f~$is $\displaystyle \mu$-measurable$\displaystyle , \int \vert f\vert^p d \mu<\infty \}.$    

When the measureable space and measure can be identified by from the context of the discussion, $ \mathcal{L}^p(S, \mathcal{S}, \mu)$ is usually abreviated to $ \mathcal{L}^p$. One usually places the following equivalence relation on $ \mathcal{L}^p$: write $ f \sim g$ iff $ f, g \in \mathcal{L}^p$ and

$\displaystyle \int \vert f-g\vert^p d\mu = 0.$    

This equivalence relation partitions $ \mathcal{L}^p$ into equivalence classes of functions, and functions belonging to the same equivalence class are equal $ \mu$-almost everywhere. Thus we have a new space, $ L^p(S, \mathcal{S}, \mu)$ consisting of equivalence classes of functions in $ \mathcal{L}^p$, and we write $ [f] \in L^p$ to express the assertion that an equivalence class $ [f]$ is in this set. Such precision is rarely needed, however, and authors usually write $ f$ instead of $ [f]$.2

Note that $ L^p$ is a linear space because because sums of integrable functions are integrable, and $ cf$ is integrable if $ f$ is integrable and $ c$ is a constant. Let $ \vert\vert[X] \vert\vert _p := (\int \vert X\vert^p)^{1/p}$ be the $ L^p$ norm of $ X$; this is an honest-to-goodness norm 3. Define convergence in $ L^p$ as follows:

$\displaystyle X_n \stackrel{L^p}{\rightarrow} X \textrm{ means } \vert\vert X_n - X\vert\vert _p \rightarrow 0$ (1)

It can be shown that $ L^p$ is complete. Therefore $ L^p$ spaces are Banach spaces for $ p \geq 1$.

$ L^2$ is a Hilbert space if we give it the inner product $ \langle f,g\rangle = \int fg\ d\mu$. You can check that the norm induced by this inner product agrees with our previous definition of the $ L^2$ norm.

For $ p=1$ $ L^p$ corresponds with the space of integrable functions

$\displaystyle L^1(\Omega, {\cal F},{\mathbb{P}}) := \{X : X$    is r.v. with$\displaystyle \ {\mathbb{E}}(\vert X\vert)<\infty\}.$ (2)

References

Real and Complex Analysis, Walter Rudin
Wikipedia: $ L^p$ spaces. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lp_space

Footnotes

...http://planetmath.org/?op=getobj&from=objects&id=3193 1
Recall that a metric space is complete if every Cauchy sequence converges to a limit.
....2
You do something similar every time you write $ \frac{1}{2}$ instead of $ [\frac{1}{2}]$, because everyone knows that a rational number $ \frac{p}{q}$ is an equivalence class of ordered pairs. $ \frac{1}{2} = \frac{2}{4} = \frac{3}{6} = \cdots $ etc.
... norm3
This definition is independent of the choice of representative of the equivalence class, i.e. if $ [Y] = [X]$ then we could replace $ X$ by $ Y$ in the integral above and the result would be the same.